Re: [PATCH] FC Transport support for vports based on NPIV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:45:13AM -0400, James Smart wrote:

> True - so this means that who-ever is setting the subchannel device
> permanent_port_name value needs to take into account this conversation,
> when T11.3 actually makes a choice on what it should be.

I will keep this in mind. Probably this would involve the FCP adapter
and the reporting in zfcp.

Anyway, my main goal was to understand the changes in the FC transport
class and the possible impact to zfcp. Thanks for the clarification
of my questions.

Christof
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux