On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:43:26PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:39:54PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:34:40AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > Hmmm, actually those other users could easily write and maintain > > > a 20-line patch that does the wait for async scans thing for them > > > using /proc/scsi/scsi in any case. > > > > How about the three users who're bothered by this extra module being > > built maintain a one-line patch to Kconfig and leave well enough alone? > > The module has an added bonus that it doesn't require any new tools to > make work. Doing it via sysfs/procfs means a new rev of whatever tool > generates the boot initrd, plus fixing up boot scripts. Loading a module > can be done via a simple option to the existing boot tools. That was what James and I thought. However, the distros seem unhappy with it. Of course, they won't actually *comment* on it, they just disable the async scan and won't talk about why. What's the point of this kernel-packagers list if not this kind of issue? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
