Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/05/07 17:10, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 12:06 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
index e62d23f..0f6c370 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
 config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
 	tristate
 	default m
-	depends on SCSI
+	depends on SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC

No.  SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is a bool ... if you depend on it, you'll force the
wait scan to be built in, which isn't the idea at all.

Try it. It doesn't force it to be built in.

Plus SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default* for async scanning.  You
can alter this at boot time, so you could need the wait scan module even
with it set to N.

static int __init wait_scan_init(void)
{
   scsi_complete_async_scans();
   return 0;
}

Could that not be built-in to SCSI as a sysfs attribute, rather than using a module to tell the kernel to do something? It looks like someone might want to call scsi_complete_async_scans() more than once too - if they also don't allow modules to be unloaded then they can't.

--
Simon Arlott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux