On Sun, 13 May 2007, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 12:20 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > since this thread looks like it's going to get away from me in a > > hurry :-), my only point in asking was to point out that that lone > > module was the only thing preventing the build from being module-free. > > > > i'm not saying that that's *necessarily* a good thing, but it just > > strikes me as odd that, out of all of the possible modules that might > > be selected in a default config for x86, this was the *only* one that > > was picked. > > > > i just think it's a bit weird, that's all. > > It's designed on the predicate that people who want to be module free > will actually set CONFIG_MODULE=n. > > If you set CONFIG_MODULE=y and build SCSI we assume you could have a > SCSI driver module at some point, which would necessitate the wait scan > module. ok, fair enough. thanks. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
