On 9/13/21 10:26, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Thanks for your input. Completely agree with you, in fact your
suggestions make sense to me. As a driver developer, surely we can
take these concerns to the IP designers and see how far we can get in
terms of standardization. That, however, is not something that can be
accomplished overnight. My main concern is, what about millions of
devices which are already in the market? UFS subsystem does support
_vops_ to handle vendor specific hooks/modifications. I am not saying
we should always follow this path, but surely until these deviations
are either fixed or become part of UFS standard itself, IMO.
Hi Alim,
If there are already millions of devices in the market that support this
feature then that's an argument to proceed with this patch series.
Thanks,
Bart.
