Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Damien,

> Re-ping ? Anything against this series ? Can we get it queued for 5.15 ?

Wrt. the choice of 'crange':

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAHk-=wiZ=wwa4oAA0y=Kztafgp0n+BDTEV6ybLoH2nvLBeJBLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

I share Linus' sentiment.

I really think 'crange' is a horribly non-descriptive name compared to
logical_block_size, max_sectors_kb, discard_max_bytes, and the other
things we export.

In addition, the recently posted copy offload patches also used
'crange', in that context to describe a 'copy range'.

Anyway. Just my opinion.

Jens: Feel free to add my Acked-by: to the sd pieces. My SCSI discovery
rework won't make 5.15.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux