Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Fix possible memory leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Fix possible memory leak
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:22:14 -0400
Cc: ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "avri.altman@xxxxxxx" <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>, "jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daejun Park <daejun7.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx" <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1891546521.01629711601304.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp3> (Keoseong Park's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:07:14 +0900")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Keoseong,

> When HPB pinned region exists and mctx allocation for this region
> fails, memory leak is possible because memory is not released for the
> subregion table of the current region.

Applied to 5.15/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Fix possible memory leak
  - From: Keoseong Park

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: snic: Fix spelling mistake "progres" -> "progress"
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_ioctl: fix error code propagation in SG_IO
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Fix possible memory leak
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Fix possible memory leak
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]