Re: [v3 0/2] scsi: target: fix sense key for invalid XCOPY request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sergey Samoylenko <s.samoylenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [v3 0/2] scsi: target: fix sense key for invalid XCOPY request
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:09:16 -0400
Cc: <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ddiss@xxxxxxx>, <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>, <target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210803145410.80147-1-s.samoylenko@yadro.com> (Sergey Samoylenko's message of "Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:54:08 +0300")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Sergey,

> EXTENDED COPY tests in libiscsi [1] show that TCM doesn't follow SPC4
> when detects invalid parameters in a XCOPY command or IO errors. The
> replies from TCM contain wrong sense key or ASCQ for incorrect
> request.

Applied to 5.15/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [v3 0/2] scsi: target: fix sense key for invalid XCOPY request
  - From: Sergey Samoylenko

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][next] scsi: smartpqi: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: Do not exit sd_spinup_disk quietly
Previous by thread: [v3 2/2] scsi: target: fix sense key for invalid XCOPY request
Next by thread: Re: [v3 0/2] scsi: target: fix sense key for invalid XCOPY request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux