On 2021/08/13 2:25, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 8/12/21 11:21 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >> >> Jens, >> >>> This looks good to me now - are we taking this through the block tree? >>> If so, would be nice to get a SCSI signoff on patch 2. >> >> I'd like to do one more review pass. Also, it may be best to take patch >> 2 through my tree since I suspect it will interfere with my VPD shuffle. > > That's fine, we can do it like that. I'll wait a day or two and pending > any last minute changes, take 1,3-5 through block. Jens, Martin, Thanks. Without patch 1, patch 2 will cause compilation errors (disk_alloc_cranges() and disk_register_cranges() will be undefined). So may be both patch 1 & 2 should got through the scsi tree ? -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
