On 6/08/21 5:50 am, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >> Since patch 1/2 went in through Greg's tree, if patch 2/2 goes >> upstream via Martin's tree, will the resulting kernel be bisectable if >> Linus pulls Martin's tree before he pulls Greg's tree? > > Also, this patch will need to be rebased on top of 5.15/scsi-staging due > to all the UFS churn in this release. > Patch "driver core: Prevent warning when removing a device link from unregistered consumer" is already in Linus' tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e64daad660a0c9ace3acdc57099fffe5ed83f977 I will rebase on 5.15/scsi-staging
