Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 10/15] sd: use bvec_virt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/4/21 2:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Use bvec_virt instead of open coding it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index b8d55af763f9..5b5b8266e142 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static blk_status_t sd_setup_unmap_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
  	cmd->cmnd[0] = UNMAP;
  	cmd->cmnd[8] = 24;
- buf = page_address(rq->special_vec.bv_page);
+	buf = bvec_virt(&rq->special_vec);
  	put_unaligned_be16(6 + 16, &buf[0]);
  	put_unaligned_be16(16, &buf[2]);
  	put_unaligned_be64(lba, &buf[8]);

The patch description is not correct. The above patch involves a functional change while the patch description suggests that no functionality has been changed.

Although the above patch looks fine to me, why has page_address() been changed into bvec_virt() in the sd driver? My understanding is that the sd driver always sets bv_offset to zero.

Thanks,

Bart.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux