On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 18:42 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Mike Christie tells me we're missing bouncing by accident in the > > scsi_execute path (but not the scsi_execute_async path). He says this > > is the fix he proposed: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=115981479822790&w=2 > > > > Can we just merge this instead? > > Short answer: No > > Long answer - it doesn't take this path. > > Different bug, both want fixing I suspect. Actually, it does take this path ... one of the things we've been doing in SCSI is slowly eliminating the old direct submission paths in favour of sending everything through the correct block layer paths. scsi_execute(), which the sr ioctl uses is just such a fixed path ... the bug is that it should be bouncing the request but because of an oversight (which Mike's patch corrects) it doesn't. The ultimate goal is to be able to eliminate the unchecked_isa_dma flag entirely and have the block layer (or device mask allocations) fix all of this in every ULD. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
