On 8/4/21 8:13 AM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The variable num_cnt is being initialized with a value that is never
read, it is being updated later on. The assignment is redundant and
can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
index fde410989c03..2db954a7aaf1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static int
qla_edif_app_getfcinfo(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, struct bsg_job *bsg_job)
{
int32_t rval = 0;
- int32_t num_cnt = 1;
+ int32_t num_cnt;
struct fc_bsg_reply *bsg_reply = bsg_job->reply;
struct app_pinfo_req app_req;
struct app_pinfo_reply *app_reply;
Looks Good.
(I am curious if that extra "next" in patch subject was a typo or some
workflow added that)
Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Himanshu Madhani Oracle Linux Engineering
