Re: [PATCH 14/15] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: multi-host configuration for exynosauto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 15:57 +0900, Chanho Park wrote:
> We divide this M-HCI as PH(Physical Host) and VHs(Virtual Host). The
> PH
> 
> supports all UFSHCI functions(all SAPs) same as conventional UFSHCI
> but
> 
> the VH only supports data transfer function. Thus, except UTP_CMD_SAP
> and
> 
> UTP_TMPSAP, the PH should handle all the physical features.

Hi Chanho park,

You mentioned this in your coverletter:

"There are two types of host controllers on the UFS host controller
that we designed. The UFS device has a Function Arbitor that arranges
commands of each host. When each host transmits a command to the
Arbitor, the Arbitor transmits it to the UTP layer".

where does this "Function Arbitor" exit? From your comments, seems it
exists on the UFS device side? right? If this is true, where is related
code in your patch?? Maybe you only submited partial of your real
driver parch for this controller??

Bean




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux