On Tue, May 08 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > BTW, any comments on the bidi patch for the block layer? Yeah it looks much better. I agree with your notion that bidi should be block layer agnostic at least for now (until a general use comes up), it's just a way to transport these commands. And I do still prefer ->next_rq as the pointer name for partly those reasons. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
