Re: [PATCH 4/9] blk-mq: Add blk_mq_tag_resize_sched_shared_sbitmap()

[John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/07/2021 08:57, Ming Lei wrote:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > index f5cb2931c20d..1e028183557d 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > @@ -584,8 +584,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_sched_shared_sbitmap(struct request_queue *queue)
> >   					&queue->sched_breserved_tags;
> >   	}
> >   
> > -	sbitmap_queue_resize(&queue->sched_bitmap_tags,
> > -			     queue->nr_requests - set->reserved_tags);
> > +	blk_mq_tag_resize_sched_shared_sbitmap(queue);
> >   
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > index 86f87346232a..55c7f1bf41c7 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > @@ -634,6 +634,16 @@ void blk_mq_tag_resize_shared_sbitmap(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, unsigned int s
> >   	sbitmap_queue_resize(&set->__bitmap_tags, size - set->reserved_tags);
> >   }
> >   
> > +/*
> > + * We always resize with q->nr_requests - q->tag_set->reserved_tags, so
> > + * don't bother passing a size.
> > + */
> > +void blk_mq_tag_resize_sched_shared_sbitmap(struct request_queue *q)
> > +{
> > +	sbitmap_queue_resize(&q->sched_bitmap_tags,
> > +			     q->nr_requests - q->tag_set->reserved_tags);
> > +}
> It is a bit hard to follow the resize part of the name, since no size
> parameter passed in. Maybe update is better?

Right, this function is a bit odd. Maybe I can just have a size argument 
for consistency with blk_mq_tag_resize_shared_sbitmap().

Thanks,
John