Re: Discard performance regression after "scsi: sd: Remove LBPRZ dependency for discards"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks so much for your comment, Martin ;)
That's really helpful.

Jianchao

On 2021/7/8 11:23 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Wang,
> 
>> We have a sata ssd with following parameters,
>>
>>   max_ws_blocks = 0
>>   max_unmap_blocks = 262143
>>   lbprz = 1
>>   lbpu = 1
>>   unmap_limit_for_ws = 0
> 
> The device is explicitly asking for us to use UNMAP so the older kernel
> choosing WRITE SAME(16) was not correct.
> 
> I have been working on an update to the discard/zeroing heuristics that
> I'll post when 5.15 opens next week. But based on what's reported it by
> your device we would still choose UNMAP for discards. LBPRZ only affects
> which command we use for zeroing.
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux