>On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 13:07 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
>> Add indentation to return statement.
>[]
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>[]
>> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>> else
>> return false;
>> #else
>> -return true;
>> + return true;
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>
>Perhaps a little refactoring instead:
>---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>index c98d540ac044d..ed89839476b3b 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>@@ -894,15 +894,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> /* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/
>-#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC
>- if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
>- !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR))
>+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC))
> return true;
>- else
>- return false;
>-#else
>-return true;
>-#endif
>+
>+ return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) &&
>+ !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR);
> }
>
> static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>
Hello Joe,
Thanks for your advice.
As you mentioned, refactoring looks good.
However, since the content does not match the title, can I submit a patch with a new title?
Best Regards,
Keoseong
