[PATCH 11/15] scsi: iser: Use scsi_get_sector() instead of scsi_get_lba()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>

Use scsi_get_sector() instead of scsi_get_lba() since the name of the
latter is confusing. This patch does not change any functionality.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210513223757.3938-3-bvanassche@xxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
index 136f6c4492e0..d6bbf1bf428c 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ u8 iser_check_task_pi_status(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task,
 			sector_t sector_off = mr_status.sig_err.sig_err_offset;
 
 			sector_div(sector_off, sector_size + 8);
-			*sector = scsi_get_lba(iser_task->sc) + sector_off;
+			*sector = scsi_get_sector(iser_task->sc) + sector_off;
 
 			iser_err("PI error found type %d at sector %llx "
 			       "expected %x vs actual %x\n",
-- 
2.31.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux