Hi Nathan,
On 2021-06-09 01:53, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 07:25:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi Can,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20210524]
[cannot apply to scsi/for-next v5.13-rc3]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a
note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Can-Guo/Optimize-host-lock-on-TR-send-compl-paths-and-utilize-UTRLCNR/20210524-163847
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git
for-next
config: arm64-randconfig-r011-20210524 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
93d1e5822ed64abd777eb94ea9899e96c4c39fbe)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
-O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
#
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/efe94162bf7973be4ed6496871b9bc9ea54e2819
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review
Can-Guo/Optimize-host-lock-on-TR-send-compl-paths-and-utilize-UTRLCNR/20210524-163847
git checkout efe94162bf7973be4ed6496871b9bc9ea54e2819
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross
ARCH=arm64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
Looks like this build warning never got taken care of before the patch
was accepted because I see it on next-20210608.
I am not aware of that it has already accepted to 5.14/scsi-staging.
I will fix it with a new patch.
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2959:6: warning: variable 'lrbp' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: note: expanded from macro
'unlikely'
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2981:32: note: uninitialized use occurs
here
(struct utp_upiu_req
*)lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr);
^~~~
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2959:2: note: remove the 'if' if its
condition is always false
if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2939:25: note: initialize the variable
'lrbp' to silence this warning
struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
^
= NULL
1 warning generated.
vim +2959 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
2924
2925 /**
2926 * ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd - API for sending device management
requests
2927 * @hba: UFS hba
2928 * @cmd_type: specifies the type (NOP, Query...)
2929 * @timeout: time in seconds
2930 *
2931 * NOTE: Since there is only one available tag for device
management commands,
2932 * it is expected you hold the hba->dev_cmd.lock mutex.
2933 */
2934 static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
2935 enum dev_cmd_type cmd_type, int timeout)
2936 {
2937 struct request_queue *q = hba->cmd_queue;
2938 struct request *req;
2939 struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
2940 int err;
2941 int tag;
2942 struct completion wait;
2943
2944 down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
2945
2946 /*
2947 * Get free slot, sleep if slots are unavailable.
2948 * Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
2949 * the maximum wait time is bounded by SCSI request timeout.
2950 */
2951 req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, 0);
2952 if (IS_ERR(req)) {
2953 err = PTR_ERR(req);
2954 goto out_unlock;
2955 }
2956 tag = req->tag;
2957 WARN_ON_ONCE(!ufshcd_valid_tag(hba, tag));
2958
> 2959 if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
2960 err = -EBUSY;
Should this goto be adjusted to out_put_tag then drop the out label?
Right, will fix it with a new change.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
2961 goto out;
2962 }
2963
2964 init_completion(&wait);
2965 lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
2966 WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
2967 err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
2968 if (unlikely(err))
2969 goto out_put_tag;
2970
2971 hba->dev_cmd.complete = &wait;
2972
2973 ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, UFS_QUERY_SEND,
lrbp->ucd_req_ptr);
2974 /* Make sure descriptors are ready before ringing the doorbell
*/
2975 wmb();
2976
2977 ufshcd_send_command(hba, tag);
2978 err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
2979 out:
2980 ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR :
UFS_QUERY_COMP,
2981 (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr);
2982
2983 out_put_tag:
2984 blk_put_request(req);
2985 out_unlock:
2986 up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
2987 return err;
2988 }
2989
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cheers,
Nathan