Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: isci: Use correctly sized target buffer for memcpy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/28/21 13:13, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> field bounds checking for memcpy(), avoid intentionally writing across
> neighboring array fields.
> 
> Switch from rsp_ui to resp_buf, since resp_ui isn't SSP_RESP_IU_MAX_SIZE
> bytes in length. This avoids future compile-time warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/isci/task.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/task.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/task.c
> index 62062ed6cd9a..eeaec26ac324 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/task.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/task.c
> @@ -709,8 +709,8 @@ isci_task_request_complete(struct isci_host *ihost,
>  		tmf->status = completion_status;
>  
>  		if (tmf->proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SSP) {
> -			memcpy(&tmf->resp.resp_iu,
> -			       &ireq->ssp.rsp,
> +			memcpy(tmf->resp.rsp_buf,
> +			       ireq->ssp.rsp_buf,
>  			       SSP_RESP_IU_MAX_SIZE);
>  		} else if (tmf->proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SATA) {
>  			memcpy(&tmf->resp.d2h_fis,
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux