Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: fix bio_add_XXX_page() return type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:35:27AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > using size_t makes it clear that these are byte counts, not (eg) sector
> > counts.  i do think it's good to make the return value unsigned so we
> > don't have people expecting a negative errno on failure.
> 
> I think the right type is bool.  We always return either 0 or the full
> length we tried to add.  Instead of optimizing for a partial add (which
> only makes sense for bio_add_hw_page anyway), I'd rather make the
> interface as simple as possible.

Sounds good to me.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux