On 5/23/21 2:14 PM, Bean Huo wrote:
> + opcode = cmd->cmnd[0];
> + if ((opcode == READ_10) || (opcode == WRITE_10)) {
> + /*
> + * Currently we only fully trace read(10) and write(10)
> + * commands
> + */
> + if (cmd->request && cmd->request->bio)
> + lba = cmd->request->bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
Why does the lba assignment occur inside the if-statement for the
READ_10 and WRITE_10 cases? Has it been considered to move that
assignment before this if-statement?
Does 'lba' represent an offset in units of 512 bytes (sector_t) or an
LBA (logical block address)? In the former case, please rename the
variable 'lba' into 'sector' or 'start_sector'. In the latter case,
please use sectors_to_logical().
Why are READ_16 and WRITE_16 ignored?
Please remove the 'if (cmd->request)' checks since these are not necessary.
> + } else if (opcode == UNMAP) {
> + if (cmd->request) {
> + lba = scsi_get_lba(cmd);
> + transfer_len = blk_rq_bytes(cmd->request);
> }
> }
The name of the variable 'transfer_len' is wrong since blk_rq_bytes()
returns the number of bytes affected on the storage medium instead of
the number of bytes transferred from the host to the storage controller.
> /**
> - * Describes the ufs rpmb wlun.
> - * Used only to send uac.
> + * Describes the ufs rpmb wlun. Used only to send uac.
> */
Is this change related to the rest of this patch?
Thanks,
Bart.
