Re: [PATCH 01/50] core: Introduce the blk_req() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/50] core: Introduce the blk_req() function
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 08:47:27 +0200
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210514213356.5264-2-bvanassche@acm.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

> +/* Variant of blk_mq_rq_from_pdu() that verifies the type of its argument. */
> +static inline struct request *blk_req(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)

Please don't use a blk_ prefix for a SCSI funtion.  Why not scsi_scmd_to_rq
or something like that?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 01/50] core: Introduce the blk_req() function
  - From: Bart Van Assche

References:
- [PATCH 00/50] Remove the request pointer from struct scsi_cmnd
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 01/50] core: Introduce the blk_req() function
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libsas: Introduce more SAM status code aliases in enum exec_status
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] scsi: target: tcmu: Fix xarray RCU warning
Previous by thread: [PATCH 01/50] core: Introduce the blk_req() function
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/50] core: Introduce the blk_req() function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux