Re: [PATCH v3 02/24] mpi3mr: base driver code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/27/21 5:47 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
>>>
>>> mpi3mr_fw.c -	Keep common code which interact with underlying
>> fw/hw.
>>> mpi3mr_os.c -	Keep common code which interact with scsi midlayer.
>>> mpi3mr_app.c -	Keep common code which interact with
>> application/ioctl.
>>> 		This is currently work in progress.
>>>
>>
>> Meaning what? That it's not finished by the time of submission?
> 
> Hannes-
> 
> Current patch series has around 15K lines so we wanted to avoid something
> which can be delayed for better review.
> Application part is ready but it is many time going through API changes, so
> having something close to freeze is better for upstream submission.
> Once this set is committed , application support is possible in next series.
> 
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct scmd_priv - SCSI command private data
>>> + *
>>> + * @host_tag: Host tag specific to operational queue
>>> + * @in_lld_scope: Command in LLD scope or not
>>> + * @scmd: SCSI Command pointer
>>> + * @req_q_idx: Operational request queue index
>>> + * @chain_idx: Chain frame index
>>> + * @mpi3mr_scsiio_req: MPI SCSI IO request
>>> + */
>>> +struct scmd_priv {
>>> +	u16 host_tag;
>>> +	u8 in_lld_scope;
>>> +	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd;
>>> +	u16 req_q_idx;
>>> +	int chain_idx;
>>> +	u8 mpi3mr_scsiio_req[MPI3MR_ADMIN_REQ_FRAME_SZ];
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> Why is this not of type MPI3_SCSI_IO_REQUEST, but rather a binary blob?
>>
> 
> Type MPI3_SCSI_IO_REQUEST is not static struct.  MPI spec designed to have
> dynamic size of " MPI3_SCSI_IO_REQUEST" but current code cannot work to
> handle dynamic size.
> In case of old MPT product (mpt3sas) most of the time we have always used
> 128 byte size from FW for MPI3_SCSI_IO_REQUEST and that may continue for
> this product as well.
> I have to discuss within a Broadcom and do changes in this area based on
> product support. For now, I have to consider your comment as TBD. Hope you
> are ok with it.
> 
Oh, that's okay. If the commands really are of different sizes then sure
you'd have to use a raw blob to avoid padding.

So:

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		        Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux