On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 15:55 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> fnic uses the following way to walk scsi commands in failure handling,
> which is obvious wrong, because caller of scsi_host_find_tag has to
> guarantee that the tag is active.
>
> for (tag = 0; tag < fnic->fnic_max_tag_id; tag++) {
> ...
> sc = scsi_host_find_tag(fnic->lport->host, tag);
> ...
> }
>
> Fix the issue by using blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() to walk
> request/scsi_command.
How does this relate to Hannes' previous patch?
https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=161400059528859&w=2
Regards
Martin
