Re: [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:06:25PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 14/04/2021 12:12, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:12:22PM +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> > > > Hi Ming,
> > > > 
> > > > > It is reported inside RH that CPU utilization is increased ~20% when
> > > > > running simple FIO test inside VM which disk is built on image stored
> > > > > on XFS/megaraid_sas.
> > > > > 
> > > > > When I try to investigate by reproducing the issue via scsi_debug, I
> > > > > found IO hang when running randread IO(8k, direct IO, libaio) on
> > > > > scsi_debug disk created by the following command:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	modprobe scsi_debug host_max_queue=128
> > > > submit_queues=$NR_CPUS
> > > > > virtual_gb=256
> > > > > 
> > > > So I can recreate this hang for using mq-deadline IO sched for scsi debug,
> > > > in
> > > > that fio does not exit. I'm using v5.12-rc7.
> > > I can also recreate this issue using mq-deadline. Using <none>, there is no
> > > IO hang issue.
> > > Also if I run script to change scheduler periodically (none, mq-deadline),
> > > sysfs entry hangs.
> > > 
> > > Here is call trace-
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [ 1229.879862]  __schedule+0x29d/0x7a0
> > > [ 1229.879871]  schedule+0x3c/0xa0
> > > [ 1229.879875]  blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x62/0x90
> > > [ 1229.879880]  ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
> > > [ 1229.879884]  elevator_switch+0x12/0x40
> > > [ 1229.879888]  elv_iosched_store+0x79/0x120
> > > [ 1229.879892]  ? kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xc7/0x1b0
> > > [ 1229.879897]  queue_attr_store+0x42/0x70
> > > [ 1229.879901]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11f/0x1b0
> > > [ 1229.879905]  new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0
> > > [ 1229.879912]  vfs_write+0x184/0x250
> > > [ 1229.879915]  ksys_write+0x59/0xd0
> > > [ 1229.879917]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> > > [ 1229.879922]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I tried both - 5.12.0-rc1 and 5.11.0-rc2+ and there is a same behavior.
> > > Let me also check  megaraid_sas and see if anything generic or this is a
> > > special case of scsi_debug.
> > As I mentioned, it could be one generic issue wrt. SCHED_RESTART.
> > shared tags might have to restart all hctx since all share same tags.
> 
> I tested on hisi_sas v2 hw (which now sets host_tagset), and can reproduce.
> Seems to be combination of mq-deadline and fio rw=randread settings required
> to reproduce from limited experiments.
> 
> Incidentally, about the mq-deadline vs none IO scheduler on the same host, I
> get this with 6x SAS SSD:
> 
> rw=read
> 		CPU util			IOPs
> mq-deadline	usr=26.80%, sys=52.78%		650K
> none		usr=22.99%, sys=74.10%		475K
> 
> rw=randread
> 		CPU util			IOPs
> mq-deadline	usr=21.72%, sys=44.18%,		423K
> none		usr=23.15%, sys=74.01%		450K

Today I re-run the scsi_debug test on two server hardwares(32cores, dual
numa nodes), and the CPU utilization issue can be reproduced, follow
the test result:

1) randread test on ibm-x3850x6[*] with deadline

              |IOPS    | FIO CPU util 
------------------------------------------------
hosttags      | 94k    | usr=1.13%, sys=14.75%
------------------------------------------------
non hosttags  | 124k   | usr=1.12%, sys=10.65%,


2) randread test on ibm-x3850x6[*] with none
              |IOPS    | FIO CPU util 
------------------------------------------------
hosttags      | 120k   | usr=0.89%, sys=6.55%
------------------------------------------------
non hosttags  | 121k   | usr=1.07%, sys=7.35%
------------------------------------------------

 *:
 	- that is the machine Yanhui reported VM cpu utilization increased by 20% 
	- kernel: latest linus tree(v5.12-rc7, commit: 7f75285ca57)
	- also run same test on another 32cores machine, IOPS drop isn't
	  observed, but CPU utilization is increased obviously

3) test script
#/bin/bash

run_fio() {
	RTIME=$1
	JOBS=$2
	DEVS=$3
	BS=$4

	QD=64
	BATCH=16

	fio --bs=$BS --ioengine=libaio \
		--iodepth=$QD \
	    --iodepth_batch_submit=$BATCH \
		--iodepth_batch_complete_min=$BATCH \
		--filename=$DEVS \
		--direct=1 --runtime=$RTIME --numjobs=$JOBS --rw=randread \
		--name=test --group_reporting
}

SCHED=$1

NRQS=`getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN`

rmmod scsi_debug
modprobe scsi_debug host_max_queue=128 submit_queues=$NRQS virtual_gb=256
sleep 2
DEV=`lsscsi | grep scsi_debug | awk '{print $6}'`
echo $SCHED > /sys/block/`basename $DEV`/queue/scheduler
echo 128 > /sys/block/`basename $DEV`/device/queue_depth
run_fio 20 16 $DEV 8K


rmmod scsi_debug
modprobe scsi_debug max_queue=128 submit_queues=1 virtual_gb=256
sleep 2
DEV=`lsscsi | grep scsi_debug | awk '{print $6}'`
echo $SCHED > /sys/block/`basename $DEV`/queue/scheduler
echo 128 > /sys/block/`basename $DEV`/device/queue_depth
run_fio 20 16 $DEV 8k



Thanks,
Ming




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux