Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: mwilck@xxxxxxxx, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:38:22 -0700
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210401091105.8046-1-mwilck@suse.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1

On 4/1/21 2:11 AM, mwilck@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> rport_dev_loss_timedout() sets the rport state to SRP_PORT_LOST and
> the SCSI target state to SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE. If this races with
> srp_reconnect_work(), a warning is printed:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
  - From: Laurence Oberman

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
  - From: mwilck

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: pm8001: clean up for open brace
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
Previous by thread: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux