Dear Paul,
On 29.03.21 23:16, Paul Menzel wrote:
[Resent from correct address.]
Am 29.03.21 um 23:15 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear Linüx folks,
Am 10.02.21 um 17:29 schrieb Don.Brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
-----Original Message-----
From: John Garry [mailto:john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 15/25] smartpqi: fix host qdepth limit
I think that this can alternatively be solved by setting .host_tagset flag.
Thanks,
John
Don: John, can I add a Suggested-by tag for you for my new patch smartpqi-use-host-wide-tagspace?
I don't mind. And I think that Ming had the same idea.
Don: Thanks for reminding me. Ming, can I add your Suggested-by tag?
It looks like, iterations 4 and 5 of the patch series have been posted in the meantime. Unfortunately without the reporters and discussion participants in Cc. Linux upstream is still broken since version 5.5.
When "smartpqi: use host wide tagspace" [1] goes into mainline, we can submit it to stable, if nobody else does. This fixes the original problem and we got a patch with the same code change running in our 5.10 kernels.
Best
Donald
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/161549369787.25025.8975999483518581619.stgit@brunhilda/
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/161540568064.19430.11157730901022265360.stgit@brunhilda/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/161549045434.25025.17473629602756431540.stgit@brunhilda/
