> > @@ -596,12 +615,43 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
> > ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> > ufshpb_set_ppn_dirty(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx, srgn_offset,
> > transfer_len);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
> > + spin_lock(&rgn->rgn_lock);
> > + rgn->reads = 0;
> > + spin_unlock(&rgn->rgn_lock);
Here also.
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > if (!ufshpb_is_support_chunk(hpb, transfer_len))
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
> > + bool activate = false;
> > + /*
> > + * in host control mode, reads are the main source for
> > + * activation trials.
> > + */
> > + spin_lock(&rgn->rgn_lock);
> > + rgn->reads++;
> > + if (rgn->reads == ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD)
> > + activate = true;
> > + spin_unlock(&rgn->rgn_lock);
> > + if (activate) {
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> > + ufshpb_update_active_info(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx);
>
> If a transfer_len (possible with HPB2.0) sits accross two
> regions/sub-regions,
> here it only updates active info of the first region/sub-region.
Yes. Will fix.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.
>
