Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote:
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when
the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2).

We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next
read.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
index 0744feb4d484..0034fa03fdc6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
@@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 		if (rgn->reads == ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD)
 			activate = true;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rgn->rgn_lock, flags);
-		if (activate) {
+		if (activate ||
+		    test_and_clear_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags)) {
 			spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
 			ufshpb_update_active_info(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx);
 			hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt++;
@@ -1480,6 +1481,20 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba,
struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 	case HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET:
 		dev_warn(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
 			 "UFS device lost HPB information during PM.\n");
+
+		if (hpb->is_hcm) {
+			struct scsi_device *sdev;
+
+			__shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
+				struct ufshpb_lu *h = sdev->hostdata;
+
+				if (!h)
+					continue;
+
+				schedule_work(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
+			}
+		}
+
 		break;
 	default:
 		dev_notice(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
@@ -1594,6 +1609,25 @@ static void
ufshpb_run_inactive_region_list(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
 }

+static void ufshpb_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)

Just curious, directly doing below things inside ufshpb_rsp_upiu() does not
seem a problem to me, does this really deserve a separate work?

Thanks,
Can Guo.

+{
+	struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
+	struct victim_select_info *lru_info;
+	struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	hpb = container_of(work, struct ufshpb_lu, ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
+
+	lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(rgn, &lru_info->lh_lru_rgn, list_lru_rgn)
+		set_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
+}
+
static void ufshpb_normalization_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
@@ -1798,6 +1832,8 @@ static int ufshpb_alloc_region_tbl(struct
ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
 		} else {
 			rgn->rgn_state = HPB_RGN_INACTIVE;
 		}
+
+		rgn->rgn_flags = 0;
 	}

 	return 0;
@@ -2012,9 +2048,12 @@ static int ufshpb_lu_hpb_init(struct ufs_hba
*hba, struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hpb->list_hpb_lu);

 	INIT_WORK(&hpb->map_work, ufshpb_map_work_handler);
-	if (hpb->is_hcm)
+	if (hpb->is_hcm) {
 		INIT_WORK(&hpb->ufshpb_normalization_work,
 			  ufshpb_normalization_work_handler);
+		INIT_WORK(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work,
+			  ufshpb_reset_work_handler);
+	}

 	hpb->map_req_cache = kmem_cache_create("ufshpb_req_cache",
 			  sizeof(struct ufshpb_req), 0, 0, NULL);
@@ -2114,8 +2153,10 @@ static void ufshpb_discard_rsp_lists(struct
ufshpb_lu *hpb)

 static void ufshpb_cancel_jobs(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
 {
-	if (hpb->is_hcm)
+	if (hpb->is_hcm) {
+		cancel_work_sync(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
 		cancel_work_sync(&hpb->ufshpb_normalization_work);
+	}
 	cancel_work_sync(&hpb->map_work);
 }

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
index 84598a317897..37c1b0ea0c0a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct ufshpb_region {
 	struct list_head list_lru_rgn;
 	unsigned long rgn_flags;
 #define RGN_FLAG_DIRTY 0
+#define RGN_FLAG_UPDATE 1

 	/* region reads - for host mode */
 	spinlock_t rgn_lock;
@@ -217,6 +218,7 @@ struct ufshpb_lu {
 	/* for selecting victim */
 	struct victim_select_info lru_info;
 	struct work_struct ufshpb_normalization_work;
+	struct work_struct ufshpb_lun_reset_work;

 	/* pinned region information */
 	u32 lu_pinned_start;



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux