On 2021-03-16 16:30, Avri Altman wrote:
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> index 6f4fd22eaf2f..0744feb4d484 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> @@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ static int ufshpb_execute_umap_req(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>>
>> blk_execute_rq_nowait(q, NULL, req, 1, ufshpb_umap_req_compl_fn);
>>
>> + hpb->stats.umap_req_cnt++;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1103,6 +1104,12 @@ static int ufshpb_issue_umap_req(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> }
>>
>> +static int ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> + struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> +{
>> + return ufshpb_issue_umap_req(hpb, rgn);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int ufshpb_issue_umap_all_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> {
>> return ufshpb_issue_umap_req(hpb, NULL);
>> @@ -1115,6 +1122,10 @@ static void __ufshpb_evict_region(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn;
>> int srgn_idx;
>>
>> +
>> + if (hpb->is_hcm && ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req(hpb, rgn))
>
> __ufshpb_evict_region() is called with rgn_state_lock held and IRQ
> disabled,
> when ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req() invokes blk_execute_rq_nowait(),
> below
> warning shall pop up every time, fix it?
>
> void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk
> *bd_disk,
> struct request *rq, int at_head,
> rq_end_io_fn *done)
> {
> WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
> ...
>
Moreover, since we are here with rgn_state_lock held and IRQ disabled,
in ufshpb_get_req(), rq = kmem_cache_alloc(hpb->map_req_cache,
GFP_KERNEL)
has the GFP_KERNEL flag, scheduling while atomic???
I think your comment applies to ufshpb_issue_umap_all_req as well,
Which is called from slave_configure/scsi_add_lun.
ufshpb_issue_umap_all_req() is not called from atomic contexts,
so ufshpb_issue_umap_all_req() is fine.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Since the host-mode series is utilizing the framework laid by the
device-mode,
Maybe you can add this comment to Daejun's last version?
Thanks,
Avri
Can Guo.
> Thanks.
> Can Guo.
>
>> + return;
>> +
>> lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
>>
>> dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "evict region %d\n",
>> rgn->rgn_idx);
>> @@ -1855,6 +1866,7 @@ ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_noti_cnt);
>> ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_active_cnt);
>> ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_inactive_cnt);
>> ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(map_req_cnt);
>> +ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(umap_req_cnt);
>>
>> static struct attribute *hpb_dev_stat_attrs[] = {
>> &dev_attr_hit_cnt.attr,
>> @@ -1863,6 +1875,7 @@ static struct attribute *hpb_dev_stat_attrs[] =
>> {
>> &dev_attr_rb_active_cnt.attr,
>> &dev_attr_rb_inactive_cnt.attr,
>> &dev_attr_map_req_cnt.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_umap_req_cnt.attr,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -1978,6 +1991,7 @@ static void ufshpb_stat_init(struct ufshpb_lu
>> *hpb)
>> hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt = 0;
>> hpb->stats.rb_inactive_cnt = 0;
>> hpb->stats.map_req_cnt = 0;
>> + hpb->stats.umap_req_cnt = 0;
>> }
>>
>> static void ufshpb_param_init(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> index bd4308010466..84598a317897 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ struct ufshpb_stats {
>> u64 rb_inactive_cnt;
>> u64 map_req_cnt;
>> u64 pre_req_cnt;
>> + u64 umap_req_cnt;
>> };
>>
>> struct ufshpb_lu {
