Re: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:47:39 +0000
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210316174645.GI4332@42.do-not-panic.com>

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:46:45PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> I've managed to reproduce blktests block/009 failures with kdevops [0]
> on linux-next tag next-20210304 with a current failure rate average of
> 1/448 (3 counted failures so far).

Confirmed on next-20210316 with current failure rate at 1/1008

  Luis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448
  - From: Luis Chamberlain

References:
- blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448
  - From: Luis Chamberlain

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix boot on ia64 (atomic_t alignment)
Next by Date: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Reset num_scatter if libata mark qc as NODATA
Previous by thread: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448
Next by thread: Re: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux