On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 15:33 +0000, Caleb Connolly wrote: > When using a device with UFS > 2.1 the error "invalid UFS version" is > misleadingly printed. There was a patch for this almost a year > ago to which this solution was suggested. > > This series replaces the use of the growing UFSHCI_VERSION_xy macros > with > an inline function to encode a major and minor version into the > scheme > used on devices, that being: > > (major << 8) + (minor << 4) > > I dealt with the different encoding used for UFS 1.x by converting it > to match the newer versions in ufshcd_get_ufs_version(). That means > it's > possible to use comparisons for version checks, e.g. > > if (hba->ufs_version < ufshci_version(3, 0)) > ... > > I've also dropped the "invalid UFS version" check entirely as it > seems to > be more misleading than useful, and hasn't been accurate for a long > time. > > This has been tested on a device with UFS 3.0 and a device with UFS > 2.1, > however I don't own any older devices to test with. > > Caleb > --- > Changes since v1: > * Switch from macro to static inline function > * Address Christoph's formatting comments > * Add Nitin's signoff on patch 3 ("scsi: ufshcd: remove version > check") > Resend: > * Fix patches 1/3 referencing the macro from v1 > instead of the new inline function > Changes since v2: > * Remove excessive parentheses from ufshci_version() > * Pick up Christoph's Reviewed-by > > Caleb Connolly (3): > scsi: ufshcd: use a function to calculate versions > scsi: ufs: qcom: use ufshci_version function > scsi: ufshcd: remove version check > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 4 +-- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------------- > ---------- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 17 +++++++----- > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > > Thanks for your patch, good look to me. Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>