RE: [PATCH v4 3/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add region's reads counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> Hi Avri,
> 
> > +static void ufshpb_normalization_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > +        struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
> > +        int rgn_idx;
> > +
> > +        hpb = container_of(work, struct ufshpb_lu,
> ufshpb_normalization_work);
> > +
> > +        for (rgn_idx = 0; rgn_idx < hpb->rgns_per_lu; rgn_idx++) {
> > +                struct ufshpb_region *rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + rgn_idx;
> 
> *HERE*
> > +                if (rgn->reads) {
> > +                        unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +                        spin_lock_irqsave(&rgn->rgn_lock, flags);
> 
> I thinks this lock should protect rgn->reads when it is accessed.
> 
> > +                        rgn->reads = (rgn->reads >> 1);
> > +                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rgn->rgn_lock, flags);
> > +                }
> *HERE*
Done.

> 
> > +
> > +                if (rgn->rgn_state != HPB_RGN_ACTIVE || rgn->reads)
> > +                        continue;
> > +
> > +                /* if region is active but has no reads - inactivate it */
> > +                spin_lock(&hpb->rsp_list_lock);
> > +                ufshpb_update_inactive_info(hpb, rgn->rgn_idx);
> > +                spin_unlock(&hpb->rsp_list_lock);
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        clear_bit(WORK_PENDING, &hpb->work_data_bits);
> 
> Why we use work_data_bits? It may be checked by worker API.
Done.

> 
> Thanks,
> Daejun




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux