On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 09:00 -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> I believe this is the third time I've seen this patch and had applied it
> to the Adaptec sources. James, please apply to your tree, I
> wholeheartedly agree with this patch! The same goes to the 'dpt_i2o.c'
> remove dead code patch ...
Sure, I can add it.
Just to make sure everyone understands, there are two methods for
getting things like this into maintained drivers
1. Just ack it and I'll add it with an "Acked-by:" tag. This is
fine except when it produces merge conflicts with another update
(in which case I become unhappy).
2. Import it into your own patch tree (and add your own
"Signed-off-by:") and then transmit it as part of your regular
patches (I like this because it means I don't have to manage any
conflicts).
James
P.S. are you taking on maintenance of dpt_i2o?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
