> > So how shall we progress now ? Shall I ask Martin to pick all the > > patches from " [PATCH v3 0/4] io_uring iopoll in scsi layer" since > > this patch has dependency on my series. > > Kashyap, > Good catch! > > You could roll all the scsi_debug stuff into one patch and put both our > sign- > offs on it, or present it as two patches: > - first one: your original plus this fix > - second one: mine with your tested-by on it Doug - I will include your patch "scsi_debug: add new defer_type for mq_poll" (including the recent fix) as separate patch in my series and provide Tested-by tag for the same. > > Since this is new functionality for the scsi sub-system, it is unlikely > that all the > corner cases have been visited. However, with what we have in place for > the > next cycle, others have something reasonably solid to build on. Agree.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
