Re: [PATCH] scsi: ipr: Remove unneeded return variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/02/2021 08:28, Yang Li wrote:
> This patch removes unneeded return variables, using only
> '0' instead.
> It fixes the following warning detected by coccinelle:
> ./drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9508:5-7: Unneeded variable: "rc". Return "0" on
> line 9524
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
> index e451102..8eced7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
> @@ -9505,7 +9505,6 @@ static pci_ers_result_t ipr_pci_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>   **/
>  static int ipr_probe_ioa_part2(struct ipr_ioa_cfg *ioa_cfg)
>  {
> -	int rc = 0;
>  	unsigned long host_lock_flags = 0;
>  
>  	ENTER;
> @@ -9521,7 +9520,7 @@ static int ipr_probe_ioa_part2(struct ipr_ioa_cfg *ioa_cfg)
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(ioa_cfg->host->host_lock, host_lock_flags);
>  
>  	LEAVE;
> -	return rc;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> 

As it's always returning 0 this is dead code as well:

	rc = ipr_probe_ioa_part2(ioa_cfg);

	if (rc) {
		__ipr_remove(pdev);
		return rc;
	}

I think:
- static int ipr_probe_ioa_part2(struct ipr_ioa_cfg *ioa_cfg)
+ static void ipr_probe_ioa_part2(struct ipr_ioa_cfg *ioa_cfg)

is the right thing to do if you really want to touch it.







[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux