Thanks John. We are planning to use request->tag for ccb tag. We will submit a patch for that soon.
Regards,
Viswas G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:46 PM
> To: Viswas G - I30667 <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; akshatzen@xxxxxxxxxx; Ruksar Devadi -
> I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; radha@xxxxxxxxxx;
> bjashnani@xxxxxxxxxx; vishakhavc@xxxxxxxxxx;
> jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ashokkumar N - X53535
> <Ashokkumar.N@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hare@xxxxxxx;
> kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> hw
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 01/02/2021 17:08, Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > AFAIK, there is no such restrictions. Any queue can be used for
> internal/external commands.
> >
>
> ok, understood.
>
> BTW, to see even more performance improvement, it would be good to use
> request->tag for ccb tag, rather that the LLDD manage this itself. I
> mentioned this perviously elsewhere. Do you plan to make that change?
> hisi_sas and megaraid sas are examples of drivers who do this.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> > Regards,
> > Viswas G
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:53 PM
> >> To: Viswas G - I30667 <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; akshatzen@xxxxxxxxxx; Ruksar Devadi -
> >> I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; radha@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> bjashnani@xxxxxxxxxx; vishakhavc@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ashokkumar N - X53535
> >> <Ashokkumar.N@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> hare@xxxxxxx; kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for
> >> pm80xx hw
> >>
> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> >> know the content is safe
> >>
> >> On 31/01/2021 07:19, Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> Thanks Johns.
> >>>
> >>> We could see a kernel crash while testing this patch.
> >>
> >> Thanks for testing.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> [ 246.724632] scsi host10: pm80xx
> >>> [ 248.005258] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0 [
> >>> 248.168973] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> >>> 0000000000000110 [ 248.175926] #PF: supervisor read access in
> >>> kernel mode [ 248.181065] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present
> >>> page [ 248.186196] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 248.188736] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >>> PTI [ 248.192230] CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: kworker/u26:2 Kdump: loaded
> >> Tainted: G S OE 5.11.0-rc3 #2
> >>> [ 248.201614] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10DRi-LN4+,
> >>> BIOS 3.1 06/08/2018 [ 248.209258] Workqueue: events_unbound
> >>> async_run_entry_fn [ 248.214571] RIP:
> >>> 0010:pm80xx_chip_sata_req+0x7f/0x5e0 [pm80xx] [ 248.220413] Code:
> >>> c1 7c c1 e9 03 4d 8b ac 24 80 01 00 00 48 c7 44 24 14 00 00 00 00 89
> >>> 04
> >>> 24 31 c0 48 c7 84 24 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 48 ab <48> 8b ba 10
> >>> 01
> >>> 00 00 e8 35 35 c6 ef c1 e8 10 89 44 24 04 0f b6 43 [ 248.239157] RSP:
> >>> 0018:ffffb98d834979f0 EFLAGS: 00010046 [ 248.244384] RAX:
> >>> 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9523c321c000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [
> >>> 248.251516] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff952450720048 RDI:
> >>> ffffb98d83497a80 [ 248.258641] RBP: ffff9523c7420000 R08:
> >>> 0000000000000100 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 248.265764] R10:
> >>> 0000000000000001 R11: ffff9523c9e40000 R12: ffff9523ca1c3600 [
> >>> 248.272887] R13: ffff9523c9e40000 R14: ffffb98d83497a04 R15:
> >> ffff952450720048 [ 248.280013] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
> >> GS:ffff9527afd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 248.288090] CS:
> >> 0010
> >> DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 248.293826] CR2:
> >> 0000000000000110 CR3: 000000029ac10001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 [
> >> 248.300952] Call Trace:
> >>
> >> I think that the problem here is that ata_queued_cmd->scmd is NULL
> >> for the ata internal command.
> >>
> >> Please try this fix:
> >>
> >> ---->8-----
> >>
> >> @@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct
> >> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> >> struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
> >> u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
> >> int ret;
> >> - u32 q_index, blk_tag;
> >> + u32 q_index = 0, blk_tag;
> >> struct sata_start_req sata_cmd;
> >> u32 hdr_tag, ncg_tag = 0;
> >> u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr; @@ -4463,8 +4463,10 @@
> >> static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> >> u32 opc = OPC_INB_SATA_HOST_OPSTART;
> >> memset(&sata_cmd, 0, sizeof(sata_cmd));
> >>
> >> - blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> >> - q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
> >> + if (scmd) {
> >> + blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> >> + q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
> >> + }
> >> circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
> >>
> >> ----8<-----
> >>
> >> You may need similar for other dispatch paths also - like smp - but I
> >> don't think that you will.
> >>
> >> BTW, do you know if there is actually a limitation on the HW that
> >> queue
> >> #0 is used for all "internal" IO (mpi), like phy control operation? Jack?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >>> [ 248.303402] pm8001_task_exec.isra.9+0x2a4/0x460 [pm80xx] [
> >>> 248.308805] sas_ata_qc_issue+0x187/0x220 [libsas] [ 248.313607]
> >>> ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0 [libata] [ 248.318069]
> >>> ata_exec_internal_sg+0x2c8/0x580 [libata] [ 248.323217]
> >>> ata_exec_internal+0x5f/0x90 [libata] [ 248.327931]
> >>> ata_dev_read_id+0x306/0x480 [libata] [ 248.332647]
> >>> ata_eh_recover+0x7ea/0x12a0 [libata] [ 248.337369] ?
> >>> vprintk_emit+0x114/0x220 [ 248.341208] ?
> >>> sas_ata_sched_eh+0x60/0x60 [libsas] [ 248.346002] ?
> >>> sas_ata_prereset+0x50/0x50 [libsas] [ 248.350795] ? printk+0x58/0x6f [
> 248.353941] ?
> >>> sas_ata_sched_eh+0x60/0x60 [libsas] [ 248.358733] ?
> >>> sas_ata_prereset+0x50/0x50 [libsas] [ 248.363525]
> >>> ata_do_eh+0x40/0xb0 [libata] [ 248.367556]
> >>> ata_scsi_port_error_handler+0x354/0x770 [libata] [ 248.373318]
> >>> async_sas_ata_eh+0x44/0x7b [libsas] [ 248.377938]
> >>> async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x160 [ 248.382040]
> >>> process_one_work+0x1cb/0x360 [ 248.386050]
> >> worker_thread+0x30/0x370
> >>> [ 248.389706] ? processe_work+0x360/0x360 [ 248.393884]
> >>> kthread+0x116/0x130 [ 248.397116] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [
> >>> 248.400773] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 248.404355] Modules linked in:
> >>> pm80xx(OE) libsas scsi_transport_sas xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE
> >>> xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nft_counter
> >> nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4
> >> nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc rfkill sunrpc vfat fat
> >> intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal
> >> intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev
> >> crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel ipmi_ssif iTCO_wdt
> >> iTCO_vendor_support mei_me rapl
> >> i2c_i801 intel_cstate mei acpi_ipmi lpc_ich intel_uncore pcspkr
> >> ipmi_si i2c_smbus ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter
> >> acpi_pad ioatdma ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sr_mod sd_mod cdrom t10_pi
> >> sg ast drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea igb sysfillrect
> >> sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm_ttm_helper ttm ahci libahci dca drm
> >> crc32c_intel libata i2c_algo_bit wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log
> >> dm_mod fuse [ 248.483431] CR2: 0000000000000110
> >>> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.11.0-rc3 (root@localhost.localdomain) (gcc
> >> (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5), GNU ld version 2.30-79.el8)
> >> #2 SMP Mon Jan 25 23:56:12 IST 2021
> >>> [ 0.000000] Command line: elfcorehr=0x45000000
> >> BOOT_IMAGE=(hd14,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.11.0-rc3 ro
> >> resume=/dev/mapper/rhel-swap rhgb console=ttyS1,115200 loglevel=7
> >> irqpoll nr_cpus=1 reset_devices cgroup_disable=memory mce=off
> >> numa=off
> >> udev.children-max=2 panic=10 rootflags=nofail acpi_no_memhotplug
> >> transparent_hugepage=never nokaslr novmcoredd hest_disable
> >> disable_cpu_apicid=0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:47 PM
> >>>> To: jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >>>> akshatzen@xxxxxxxxxx; Viswas G - I30667
> <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> >>>> Ruksar Devadi - I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> >>>> radha@xxxxxxxxxx; bjashnani@xxxxxxxxxx; vishakhavc@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >>>> jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ashokkumar N - X53535
> >>>> <Ashokkumar.N@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >>>> hare@xxxxxxx; kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> John
> >>>> Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
> >> hw
> >>>>
> >>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> >>>> know the content is safe
> >>>>
> >>>> In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
> >>>> queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple
> >>>> HW queues.
> >>>>
> >>>> In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW queues were not
> >>>> exposed to upper layer, and instead the driver managed the queues
> >> internally.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, this management duplicates blk-mq code. In addition, the
> >>>> HW queue management is sub-optimal for a system where the number
> of
> >> CPUs
> >>>> exceeds the HW queues - this is because queues are selected in a
> >>>> round- robin fashion, when it would be better to make adjacent CPUs
> >>>> submit on the same queue. And finally, the affinity of the
> >>>> completion queue interrupts is not set to mirror the cpu<->HQ queue
> >>>> mapping, which
> >> is suboptimal.
> >>>>
> >>>> As such, for when MSIX is supported, expose HW queues to upper
> layer.
> >>>> Flag PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY is set for allocating the MSIX vectors to
> >>>> automatically assign affinity for the completion queue interrupts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> I sent as an RFC/RFT as I have no HW to test. In addition, since HW
> >>>> queue
> >>>> #0 is used always for internal commands (like in
> >>>> send_task_abort()), if all CPUs associated with HW queue #0 are
> >>>> offlined, the interrupt for that queue will be shutdown, and no
> >>>> CPUs would be available to service any internal commands
> >>>> completion. To solve that, we need [0] merged first and switch over
> >>>> to use the new API. But we can still test
> >> performance in the meantime.
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume someone else is making the change to use the request tag
> >>>> for IO tag management.
> >>>>
> >>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/47ba045e-a490-198b-1744-
> >>>> 529f97192d3b@xxxxxxx/
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> >>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> >>>> index ee2de177d0d0..73479803a23e 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> >>>> @@ -81,6 +81,15 @@ LIST_HEAD(hba_list);
> >>>>
> >>>> struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq;
> >>>>
> >>>> +static int pm8001_map_queues(struct Scsi_Host *shost) {
> >>>> + struct sas_ha_struct *sha = SHOST_TO_SAS_HA(shost);
> >>>> + struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha = sha->lldd_ha;
> >>>> + struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap =
> >>>> +&shost->tag_set.map[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT];
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return blk_mq_pci_map_queues(qmap, pm8001_ha->pdev, 0); }
> >>>> +
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * The main structure which LLDD must register for scsi core.
> >>>> */
> >>>> @@ -106,6 +115,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template pm8001_sht = {
> >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >>>> .compat_ioctl = sas_ioctl,
> >>>> #endif
> >>>> + .map_queues = pm8001_map_queues,
> >>>> .shost_attrs = pm8001_host_attrs,
> >>>> .track_queue_depth = 1,
> >>>> };
> >>>> @@ -923,9 +933,8 @@ static int
> pm8001_configure_phy_settings(struct
> >>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) static u32 pm8001_setup_msix(struct
> >>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) {
> >>>> u32 number_of_intr;
> >>>> - int rc, cpu_online_count;
> >>>> + int rc;
> >>>> unsigned int allocated_irq_vectors;
> >>>> -
> >>>> /* SPCv controllers supports 64 msi-x */
> >>>> if (pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8001) {
> >>>> number_of_intr = 1; @@ -933,16 +942,15 @@ static
> >>>> u32 pm8001_setup_msix(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> >>>> number_of_intr = PM8001_MAX_MSIX_VEC;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> - cpu_online_count = num_online_cpus();
> >>>> - number_of_intr = min_t(int, cpu_online_count, number_of_intr);
> >>>> - rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pm8001_ha->pdev, number_of_intr,
> >>>> - number_of_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> >>>> + /* Use default affinity descriptor, which spreads *all* vectors */
> >>>> + rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pm8001_ha->pdev, 1,
> >>>> + number_of_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX |
> >>>> + PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
> >>>> allocated_irq_vectors = rc;
> >>>> if (rc < 0)
> >>>> return rc;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Assigns the number of interrupts */
> >>>> - number_of_intr = min_t(int, allocated_irq_vectors,
> number_of_intr);
> >>>> + number_of_intr = allocated_irq_vectors;
> >>>> pm8001_ha->number_of_intr = number_of_intr;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Maximum queue number updating in HBA structure */ @@
> >>>> -1113,6
> >>>> +1121,16 @@ static int pm8001_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >>>> if (rc)
> >>>> goto err_out_enable;
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (pm8001_ha->number_of_intr > 1) {
> >>>> + shost->nr_hw_queues = pm8001_ha->number_of_intr;
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * For now, ensure we're not sent too many commands
> >>>> + by
> >> setting
> >>>> + * host_tagset. This is also required if we start using request
> >>>> + * tag.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + shost->host_tagset = 1;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> rc = scsi_add_host(shost, &pdev->dev);
> >>>> if (rc)
> >>>> goto err_out_ha_free; diff --git
> >>>> a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> >>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> >>>> index f2c8cbad3853..74bc6fed693e 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> >>>> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
> >>>> #include <scsi/scsi_tcq.h>
> >>>> #include <scsi/sas_ata.h>
> >>>> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/blk-mq-pci.h>
> >>>> #include "pm8001_defs.h"
> >>>>
> >>>> #define DRV_NAME "pm80xx"
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> >>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> >>>> index 6772b0924dac..31d65ce91e7d 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> >>>> @@ -4299,12 +4299,13 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_ssp_io_req(struct
> >>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> >>>> struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
> >>>> struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
> >>>> struct ssp_ini_io_start_req ssp_cmd;
> >>>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = task->uldd_task;
> >>>> u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
> >>>> int ret;
> >>>> u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr;
> >>>> u32 end_addr_high, end_addr_low;
> >>>> struct inbound_queue_table *circularQ;
> >>>> - u32 q_index, cpu_id;
> >>>> + u32 blk_tag, q_index;
> >>>> u32 opc = OPC_INB_SSPINIIOSTART;
> >>>> memset(&ssp_cmd, 0, sizeof(ssp_cmd));
> >>>> memcpy(ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.lun, task->ssp_task.LUN, 8); @@
> >>>> -4323,8
> >>>> +4324,8 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_ssp_io_req(struct
> pm8001_hba_info
> >>>> *pm8001_ha,
> >>>> ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.efb_prio_attr |= (task->ssp_task.task_attr & 7);
> >>>> memcpy(ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.cdb, task->ssp_task.cmd->cmnd,
> >>>> task->ssp_task.cmd->cmd_len);
> >>>> - cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> >>>> - q_index = (u32) (cpu_id) % (pm8001_ha->max_q_num);
> >>>> + blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> >>>> + q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
> >>>> circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Check if encryption is set */ @@ -4446,9 +4447,11 @@
> >>>> static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info
> *pm8001_ha,
> >>>> struct sas_task *task = ccb->task;
> >>>> struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
> >>>> struct pm8001_device *pm8001_ha_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
> >>>> + struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = task->uldd_task;
> >>>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
> >>>> u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
> >>>> int ret;
> >>>> - u32 q_index, cpu_id;
> >>>> + u32 q_index, blk_tag;
> >>>> struct sata_start_req sata_cmd;
> >>>> u32 hdr_tag, ncg_tag = 0;
> >>>> u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr; @@ -4459,8 +4462,9
> >>>> @@ static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info
> *pm8001_ha,
> >>>> unsigned long flags;
> >>>> u32 opc = OPC_INB_SATA_HOST_OPSTART;
> >>>> memset(&sata_cmd, 0, sizeof(sata_cmd));
> >>>> - cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> >>>> - q_index = (u32) (cpu_id) % (pm8001_ha->max_q_num);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> >>>
> >>> Here the scsi command is NULL.
> >>>
> >>> if(scmd) {
> >>> blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> >>> q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
> >>> } else {
> >>> q_index = 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> With this change, we have started our testing. We will update you
> >>> the
> >> result soon.
> >>>
> >>>> + q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
> >>>> circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
> >>>>
> >>>> if (task->data_dir == DMA_NONE) {
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.26.2
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >
