On 2021-01-30 00:55, Bean Huo wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:37 +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:As per JESD223D UFS HCI v3.0 spec, HCI version 3.0 is also supported. Hence Adding UFS3.0 in UFS HCI version check to avoid logging of the error message. Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++-- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index 82ad317..54ca765 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -9255,8 +9255,9 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) && (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) && (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) && - (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21)) - dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS version 0x%x\n", + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) && + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30)) + dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS HCI version 0x%x\n", hba->ufs_version);Hi Nitin Except HCI 1.0 / 1.1 / 2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0, do you have the other UFS HCI version? if no, current driver supports all of them, instead of scaling these check, and avoid logging of the error message, I suggest you can directly delete these redundant checkup. If there is a weird HCI version that not supported by the current driver, you can only add an unsupported checkup list. thus, you don't need to scale this useless checkup. Bean
Hi Bean, That's a good suggestion. If nobody has any concern, i will post new patchset by removing these redundant check. Regards, Nitin
