On 1/27/21 20:47, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> -void sd_zbc_release_disk(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> +static void sd_zbc_clear_zone_info(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> {
> + /* Serialize against revalidate zones */
> + mutex_lock(&sdkp->rev_mutex);
> +
> kvfree(sdkp->zones_wp_offset);
> sdkp->zones_wp_offset = NULL;
> kfree(sdkp->zone_wp_update_buf);
> sdkp->zone_wp_update_buf = NULL;
> +
> + sdkp->nr_zones = 0;
> + sdkp->rev_nr_zones = 0;
> + sdkp->zone_blocks = 0;
> + sdkp->rev_zone_blocks = 0;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&sdkp->rev_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +void sd_zbc_release_disk(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> +{
> + if (sd_is_zoned(sdkp))
> + sd_zbc_clear_zone_info(sdkp);
> }
>
If I'm not wrong there is only one caller for sd_zbc_clear_zone_info().
Is there any reason why sd_zbc_clear_zone_info() is notopen coded with
a meaningful comment in sd_zbc_release_disk() ? e.g. :-
void sd_zbc_release_disk(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
{
if (!sd_is_zoned(sdkp))
return;
/* Serialize against revalidate zones */
mutex_lock(&sdkp->rev_mutex);
kvfree(sdkp->zones_wp_offset);
sdkp->zones_wp_offset = NULL;
kfree(sdkp->zone_wp_update_buf);
sdkp->zone_wp_update_buf = NULL;
/* clear zone info */
sdkp->nr_zones = 0;
sdkp->rev_nr_zones = 0;
sdkp->zone_blocks = 0;
sdkp->rev_zone_blocks = 0;
mutex_unlock(&sdkp->rev_mutex);
}
unless I miss something, in either case LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx>
