Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Fix a possible NULL pointer issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-01-02 20:29, Can Guo wrote:
On 2021-01-02 00:05, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/31/20 9:44 PM, Can Guo wrote:
During system resume/suspend, hba could be NULL. In this case, do not touch
eh_sem.

Fixes: 88a92d6ae4fe ("scsi: ufs: Serialize eh_work with system PM events and async scan")

Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index e221add..34e2541 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -8896,8 +8896,11 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	int ret = 0;
 	ktime_t start = ktime_get();

+	if (!hba)
+		return 0;
+
 	down(&hba->eh_sem);
-	if (!hba || !hba->is_powered)
+	if (!hba->is_powered)
 		return 0;

 	if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) ==
@@ -8945,10 +8948,8 @@ int ufshcd_system_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	int ret = 0;
 	ktime_t start = ktime_get();

-	if (!hba) {
-		up(&hba->eh_sem);
+	if (!hba)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	}

 	if (!hba->is_powered || pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev))
 		/*

Hi Can,

How can ufshcd_system_suspend() or ufshcd_system_resume() be called with a NULL argument? In ufshcd_pci_probe() I see that pci_set_drvdata() is called before pm_runtime_allow(). ufshcd_pci_remove() calls pm_runtime_forbid().

Thanks,

Bart.

Hi Bart,

You are right about ufshcd_RUNTIME_suspend/resume() - platform_set_drvdata() is called before pm_runtime_enable(), so runtime suspend/resume cannot happen before pm_runtime_enable() is called. We can remove the sanity checks of
!hba there, they are outdated.

Add more history here - before Stanley's change (see below), platform_set_drvdata() is called AFTER pm_runtime_enable(), which was why we needed sanity checks of !hba. But now the sanity checks are unnecessary in ufshcd_RUNTIME_suspend/resume(), so
feel free to remove them.

But still, things are a bit different for ufshcd_SYSTEM_suspend/resume(), we need
the sanity checks of !hba there if my understanding is correct.

commit 24e2e7a19f7e4b83d0d5189040d997bce3596473
Author: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Jun 12 23:19:05 2019 +0800

    scsi: ufs: Avoid runtime suspend possibly being blocked forever

Thanks,
Can Guo.


But for ufshcd_SYSTEM_suspend/resume() callbacks (not runtime ones), my
understanding is that system suspend/resume may happen after probe (vendor
driver probe calls ufshcd_pltfrm_init()) starts but before
platform_set_drvdata()
is called, in this case hba is NULL.

int ufshcd_pltfrm_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
		       const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops *vops)
{
...
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hba);

	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
}

Thanks,

Can Guo.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux