Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: Remove redundant null checking of devfreq instance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote:
hba->devfreq is zero-initialized thus it is not required
to check its existence in ufshcd_add_lus() function which
is invoked during initialization only.

Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index a91b73a1fc48..9cc16598136d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -7636,15 +7636,13 @@ static int ufshcd_add_lus(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 			&hba->pwr_info,
 			sizeof(struct ufs_pa_layer_attr));
 		hba->clk_scaling.saved_pwr_info.is_valid = true;
-		if (!hba->devfreq) {

Just FYI, checking this was due to consideration for supporting UFS cards which can do hot-plug. But UFS cards seems out of the picture for a long time. Anyways, if someday UFS cards come back in future, let's add these checks back again.

Thanks,

Can Guo.

-			hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true;
-			ret = ufshcd_devfreq_init(hba);
-			if (ret)
-				goto out;
+		hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true;
+		ret = ufshcd_devfreq_init(hba);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;

-			hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled = true;
-			ufshcd_clkscaling_init_sysfs(hba);
-		}
+		hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled = true;
+		ufshcd_clkscaling_init_sysfs(hba);
 	}

 	ufs_bsg_probe(hba);



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux