On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 20:51 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> ufshcd_variant_hba_exit(hba);
> ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false);
> ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
> @@ -9436,6 +9441,20 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_init);
>
> +static int __init ufshcd_core_init(void)
> +{
> + ufs_debugfs_init();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit ufshcd_core_exit(void)
> +{
> + ufs_debugfs_exit();
> +}
Hi, Adrian
The purpose of patch is acceptable, but I don't know why you choose
using ufshcd_core_* here.
Also. I don't know if module_init() is a proper way here.
thanks,
Bean
>
> n
> +
> +module_init(ufshcd_core_init);
> +module_exit(ufshcd_core_exit)
