Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: fix memory boundary check for UFS 3.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/11, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:38:14AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > If param_offset is greater than what UFS supports, it'll give kernel panic.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Change-Id: I48ea6f3f3074bd42abf4ecf8be87806732f3e6a3
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index d6a3a0ba6960..04687661d0df 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -3194,6 +3194,9 @@ int ufshcd_read_desc_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (param_offset > buff_len)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >  	/* Check whether we need temp memory */
> >  	if (param_offset != 0 || param_size < buff_len) {
> >  		desc_buf = kmalloc(buff_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -- 
> 
> Didn't this already get fixed by:
> 
> 	commit 1699f980d87fb678a669490462cf0b9517c1fb47
> 	Author: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 	Date:   Wed Oct 21 22:59:00 2020 -0700
> 
> 	    scsi: ufs: Fix unexpected values from ufshcd_read_desc_param()

Oh, cool. Yes, please ignore this.

Thanks,



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux