Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Fix a race condition between ufshcd_abort and eh_work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-12-02 16:48, Stanley Chu wrote:
Hi Can,

On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 00:24 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
In current task abort routine, if task abort happens to the device W-LU,
the code directly jumps to ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() to perform a
full reset and restore then returns FAIL or SUCCESS. Commands sent to the device W-LU are most likely the SSU cmds sent during UFS PM operations. If such SSU cmd enters task abort routine, when ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() flushes eh_work, it will get stuck there since err_handler is serialized
with PM operations.

In order to unblock above call path, we merely clean up the lrb taken by this cmd, queue the eh_work and return SUCCESS. Once the cmd is aborted, the PM operation which sends out the cmd just errors out, then err_handler
shall be able to proceed with the full reset and restore.

In this scenario, the cmd is aborted even before it is actually cleared by HW, set the lrb->in_use flag to prevent subsequent cmds, including SCSI cmds and dev cmds, from taking the lrb released from abort. The flag shall evetually be cleared in __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() invoked by the full
reset and restore from err_handler.

Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index f0bb3fc..fa90e15 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -2539,6 +2539,14 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 		(hba->clk_gating.state != CLKS_ON));

 	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
+	if (unlikely(lrbp->in_use)) {
+		if (hba->pm_op_in_progress)
+			set_host_byte(cmd, DID_BAD_TARGET);
+		else
+			err = SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
+		ufshcd_release(hba);
+		goto out;
+	}

 	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
 	lrbp->cmd = cmd;
@@ -2781,6 +2789,11 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,

 	init_completion(&wait);
 	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
+	if (unlikely(lrbp->in_use)) {
+		err = -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
 	err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
 	if (unlikely(err))
@@ -2797,6 +2810,7 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,

 	err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);

+out:
 	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, tag,
 			err ? "query_complete_err" : "query_complete");

@@ -4932,6 +4946,7 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,

 	for_each_set_bit(index, &completed_reqs, hba->nutrs) {
 		lrbp = &hba->lrb[index];
+		lrbp->in_use = false;
 		lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
 		cmd = lrbp->cmd;
 		if (cmd) {
@@ -6374,8 +6389,12 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,

 	init_completion(&wait);
 	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
-	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
+	if (unlikely(lrbp->in_use)) {
+		err = -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}

+	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
 	lrbp->cmd = NULL;
 	lrbp->sense_bufflen = 0;
 	lrbp->sense_buffer = NULL;
@@ -6447,6 +6466,7 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 		}
 	}

+out:
 	blk_put_request(req);
 out_unlock:
 	up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
@@ -6696,16 +6716,6 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 		BUG();
 	}

-	/*
-	 * Task abort to the device W-LUN is illegal. When this command
-	 * will fail, due to spec violation, scsi err handling next step
-	 * will be to send LU reset which, again, is a spec violation.
-	 * To avoid these unnecessary/illegal step we skip to the last error
-	 * handling stage: reset and restore.
-	 */
-	if (lrbp->lun == UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN)
-		return ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler(cmd);
-
 	ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
 	reg = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
 	/* If command is already aborted/completed, return SUCCESS */
@@ -6726,7 +6736,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
* to reduce repeated printouts. For other aborted requests only print
 	 * basic details.
 	 */
-	scsi_print_command(hba->lrb[tag].cmd);
+	scsi_print_command(cmd);
 	if (!hba->req_abort_count) {
 		ufshcd_update_reg_hist(&hba->ufs_stats.task_abort, 0);
 		ufshcd_print_host_regs(hba);
@@ -6745,6 +6755,27 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 		goto cleanup;
 	}

+	/*
+	 * Task abort to the device W-LUN is illegal. When this command
+	 * will fail, due to spec violation, scsi err handling next step
+	 * will be to send LU reset which, again, is a spec violation.
+	 * To avoid these unnecessary/illegal steps, first we clean up
+	 * the lrb taken by this cmd and mark the lrb as in_use, then
+	 * queue the eh_work and bail.
+	 */
+	if (lrbp->lun == UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
+		if (lrbp->cmd) {
+			__ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(hba, (1UL << tag));

The timed out "tag" is cleared once here.

+			__set_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
+			lrbp->in_use = true;
+			hba->force_reset = true;
+			ufshcd_schedule_eh_work(hba);

The same "tag" would be cleared again in error handler with
__ufshcd_transfer_req_compl().

In __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl, hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs will be
decreased if clk-scaling is supported as below,

	if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
		hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;

Will be the hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs value become abnormal by this
flow?


Yes, it may undershoot. Actually the logic in __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
should be updated - clk_scaling.active_reqs should be updated only when
there are cmds (scsi or query) to complete. Here is not the only place which
can cause a undershoot. We can prevent the undershoot with below check.

 	if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba) &&
            hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs > 0)
 		hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;

Thanks,

Can Guo.

Thanks,
Stanley Chu

+		}
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
/* Skip task abort in case previous aborts failed and report failure */
 	if (lrbp->req_abort_skip)
 		err = -EIO;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 1e680bf..66e5338 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct ufs_pm_lvl_states {
* @crypto_key_slot: the key slot to use for inline crypto (-1 if none) * @data_unit_num: the data unit number for the first block for inline crypto
  * @req_abort_skip: skip request abort task flag
+ * @in_use: indicates that this lrb is still in use
  */
 struct ufshcd_lrb {
 	struct utp_transfer_req_desc *utr_descriptor_ptr;
@@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ struct ufshcd_lrb {
 #endif

 	bool req_abort_skip;
+	bool in_use;
 };

 /**



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux