Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT

To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:31:26 +0100
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20201130024615.29171-5-bvanassche@acm.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH v4 4/9] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT
  - From: Bart Van Assche