Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove scale down gear hard code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/26/2020 5:58 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Instead of making the scale down gear a hard code, make it a member of
ufs_clk_scaling struct.

Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 12 +++++++-----
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  2 ++
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 44254c9..1789df3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1100,7 +1100,6 @@ static int ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(struct ufs_hba *hba,
   */
  static int ufshcd_scale_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
  {
-	#define UFS_MIN_GEAR_TO_SCALE_DOWN	UFS_HS_G1
  	int ret = 0;
  	struct ufs_pa_layer_attr new_pwr_info;
@@ -1111,16 +1110,16 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
  		memcpy(&new_pwr_info, &hba->pwr_info,
  		       sizeof(struct ufs_pa_layer_attr));
- if (hba->pwr_info.gear_tx > UFS_MIN_GEAR_TO_SCALE_DOWN
-		    || hba->pwr_info.gear_rx > UFS_MIN_GEAR_TO_SCALE_DOWN) {
+		if (hba->pwr_info.gear_tx > hba->clk_scaling.min_gear ||
+		    hba->pwr_info.gear_rx > hba->clk_scaling.min_gear) {
  			/* save the current power mode */
  			memcpy(&hba->clk_scaling.saved_pwr_info.info,
  				&hba->pwr_info,
  				sizeof(struct ufs_pa_layer_attr));
/* scale down gear */
-			new_pwr_info.gear_tx = UFS_MIN_GEAR_TO_SCALE_DOWN;
-			new_pwr_info.gear_rx = UFS_MIN_GEAR_TO_SCALE_DOWN;
+			new_pwr_info.gear_tx = hba->clk_scaling.min_gear;
+			new_pwr_info.gear_rx = hba->clk_scaling.min_gear;
  		}
  	}
@@ -1824,6 +1823,9 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  	if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
  		return;
+ if (!hba->clk_scaling.min_gear)
+		hba->clk_scaling.min_gear = UFS_HS_G1;
+
  	INIT_WORK(&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work,
  		  ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work);
  	INIT_WORK(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work,
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 6f0f2d4..bdab23e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ struct ufs_saved_pwr_info {
   * @workq: workqueue to schedule devfreq suspend/resume work
   * @suspend_work: worker to suspend devfreq
   * @resume_work: worker to resume devfreq
+ * @min_gear: lowest HS gear to scale down to
   * @is_allowed: tracks if scaling is currently allowed or not
   * @is_busy_started: tracks if busy period has started or not
   * @is_suspended: tracks if devfreq is suspended or not
@@ -399,6 +400,7 @@ struct ufs_clk_scaling {
  	struct workqueue_struct *workq;
  	struct work_struct suspend_work;
  	struct work_struct resume_work;
+	u32 min_gear;
  	bool is_allowed;
  	bool is_busy_started;
  	bool is_suspended;



--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux