Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] sym53c8xx: remove trailing semicolon in macro definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 10:29 -0800, trix@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The macro use will already have a semicolon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c
> b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c
> index d9a045f9858c..f3b3345c1766 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c
> @@ -1001,12 +1001,12 @@ static int is_keyword(char *ptr, int len,
> char *verb)
>  #define SKIP_SPACES(ptr, len)					
> 	\
>  	if ((arg_len = sym_skip_spaces(ptr, len)) < 1)			
> \
>  		return -EINVAL;						
> \
> -	ptr += arg_len; len -= arg_len;
> +	ptr += arg_len; len -= arg_len
>  
>  #define GET_INT_ARG(ptr, len, v)					
> \
>  	if (!(arg_len = get_int_arg(ptr, len, &(v))))			
> \
>  		return -EINVAL;						
> \
> -	ptr += arg_len; len -= arg_len;
> +	ptr += arg_len; len -= arg_len

Those macros have the wrong form which can lead to actual bugs and this
cosmetic change does nothing to fix it.  If the goal here is to get the
code base into better shape, please fix the bugs.

James





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux