Re: [PATCH 1/8] target: fix lun ref count handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Oct 29, 2020, at 1:49 AM, Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This fixes 2 bugs in the lun refcounting.
> 
> 1. For the TCM_WRITE_PROTECTED case we were returning an error after
> taking a ref to the lun, but never dropping it (caller just send
> status and drops cmd ref).
> 
> 2. We still need to do a percpu_ref_tryget_live for the virt lun0 like
> we do for other luns, because the tpg code does the refcount/wait
> process like it does with other luns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> index 405d82d..1f673fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,16 @@
> 			atomic_long_add(se_cmd->data_length,
> 					&deve->read_bytes);
> 
> +		if ((se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) &&
> +		    deve->lun_access_ro) {
> +			pr_err("TARGET_CORE[%s]: Detected WRITE_PROTECTED LUN"
> +				" Access for 0x%08llx\n",
> +				se_cmd->se_tfo->fabric_name,
> +				se_cmd->orig_fe_lun);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			return TCM_WRITE_PROTECTED;
> +		}
> +
> 		se_lun = rcu_dereference(deve->se_lun);
> 
> 		if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&se_lun->lun_ref)) {
> @@ -76,17 +86,6 @@
> 		se_cmd->pr_res_key = deve->pr_res_key;
> 		se_cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SE_LUN_CMD;
> 		se_cmd->lun_ref_active = true;
> -
> -		if ((se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) &&
> -		    deve->lun_access_ro) {
> -			pr_err("TARGET_CORE[%s]: Detected WRITE_PROTECTED LUN"
> -				" Access for 0x%08llx\n",
> -				se_cmd->se_tfo->fabric_name,
> -				se_cmd->orig_fe_lun);
> -			rcu_read_unlock();
> -			ret = TCM_WRITE_PROTECTED;
> -			goto ref_dev;
> -		}
> 	}
> out_unlock:
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -106,21 +105,20 @@
> 			return TCM_NON_EXISTENT_LUN;
> 		}
> 
> -		se_lun = se_sess->se_tpg->tpg_virt_lun0;
> -		se_cmd->se_lun = se_sess->se_tpg->tpg_virt_lun0;
> -		se_cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SE_LUN_CMD;
> -
> -		percpu_ref_get(&se_lun->lun_ref);
> -		se_cmd->lun_ref_active = true;
> -
> 		/*
> 		 * Force WRITE PROTECT for virtual LUN 0
> 		 */
> 		if ((se_cmd->data_direction != DMA_FROM_DEVICE) &&
> -		    (se_cmd->data_direction != DMA_NONE)) {
> -			ret = TCM_WRITE_PROTECTED;
> -			goto ref_dev;
> -		}
> +		    (se_cmd->data_direction != DMA_NONE))
> +			return TCM_WRITE_PROTECTED;
> +
> +		se_lun = se_sess->se_tpg->tpg_virt_lun0;
> +		if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&se_lun->lun_ref))
> +			return TCM_NON_EXISTENT_LUN;
> +
> +		se_cmd->se_lun = se_sess->se_tpg->tpg_virt_lun0;
> +		se_cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SE_LUN_CMD;
> +		se_cmd->lun_ref_active = true;
> 	}
> 	/*
> 	 * RCU reference protected by percpu se_lun->lun_ref taken above that
> @@ -128,7 +126,6 @@
> 	 * pointer can be kfree_rcu() by the final se_lun->lun_group put via
> 	 * target_core_fabric_configfs.c:target_fabric_port_release
> 	 */
> -ref_dev:
> 	se_cmd->se_dev = rcu_dereference_raw(se_lun->lun_se_dev);
> 	atomic_long_inc(&se_cmd->se_dev->num_cmds);
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Looks Good.

Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Himanshu Madhani	 Oracle Linux Engineering





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux